top of page

Leadership: it's a team sport.

Mission

Same passionate intent. New objectives and ways of working.

SIA holds strongly to our intent: Integrity in Sport. But as threats to integrity become faster and more complex, the way we collaborate must evolve.

Image by Florian Schmetz

SIA Leadership Conference

Together, we'll plan, listen, design, engage, build, showcase and test.

On 23 April, SIA will gather together its leaders to collaborate, solve and build NASA's next mission: Humans on Mars. A multi-year transit and stay. 

 

Can we arrive, stay and return safely?

Flyer.png

Learning from Others

Evolving collaboration

NASA's intent in travelling to Mars has remained the same across all missions. The way they work together and collaborate has evolved over time in response to changing problems, capability and technology.

1960s: The Flyby

Verification. Can we see it? 

Proving that a spacecraft can survive the journey to Mars and take a photo of the planet.

beautiful-view-of-the-planet-mars-2026-03-18-16-20-44-utc_25%.png

1970s: The Orbiter + Lander

Observation. What's it like on the ground?

 

Landing in one spot (Project Viking) to see if the environment is hospitable and if life is visible.

51221.png

1990s: The Pathfinder

Capability. Can we move around without it costing too much?

Proving a low-cost, mobile rover can survive and diverse teams can build it rapidly under constraints.

Rover.gif

2000 - 2010s: The Rovers

Exploration. Was there ever water or life?

Sustained, long-term robotic presence to map the planet’s history and "follow the water."

26161.jpg

2012 - now: The Laboratory

Science Integration. Can we find the building blocks for life?

Using high-complexity mobile labs (Curiosity + Perseverance) to conduct deep chemistry and prepare for human arrival.

Pet5MFuivbZL7XDeS6SYdk_10%.png

Feeling the Pressure

01

Background

In the early 1990s, NASA was facing a crisis of confidence. Previous missions were expensive and took a decade to develop. The usual way of operating had become deeply entrenched. Specialised disciplines like propulsion, navigation, and science, functioned as distinct centres of excellence.

02

Defining the problem

Each team would perfect their component and then engage in a formal handoff, essentially passing their completed work to the next group in the chain. This linear process ensured high technical standards but slowed down the mission (8-10 years), and made it much more expensive and rigid.

03

Faster, better, cheaper

For the Mars Pathfinder mission, this model was intentionally dismantled. NASA was tasked with delivering an integrated flight system consisting of a cruise vehicle, a stationary lander, and the first-ever mobile rover, Sojourner.

04

Shifting behaviour

This required a "Design-Build-Fly" approach that collapsed the traditional boundaries between those who built the hardware and those who operated it. To achieve this, NASA assembled a small, cross-functional team and co-located them in a single workspace for around three years.

05

Mindset shift one

Because the budget was so thin and the schedule so aggressive, a delay in one area immediately stalled everyone else. Scientists, software architects, and mechanical engineers were compelled to engage in constant, real-time dialogue. If the software team needed to update the landing code, they couldn’t wait for a formal report, they would engage with the hardware team directly.

Use highly collaborative behaviours.

06

Mindset shift two

This environment presented a significant shift for the subject matter experts involved. Used to a structure that prioritised deep, undisturbed focus, they were now asked to work in a way that felt much more exposed. Instead of presenting a polished, finalised handoff, experts had to share half-finished ideas and early-stage problems. This required a challenging transition from being the sole authority in a field to being a contributor within a fast-moving, noisy system.

Share and test early.

07

Tools and spaces

This sparked initial friction, as constant interruptions and real-time trade-offs could feel like a distraction from the technical depth people were used to. To overcome this, the team moved beyond talking and into early, shared testing. By building test-beds where the software, sensors, and rover motors were plugged together months earlier than usual, the friction shifted from interpersonal to technical. When a software expert saw their code fail because of a hardware quirk they hadn't considered, the interruption from the hardware engineer was no longer seen as a distraction, but as a critical save and viewed as shared wins in the lab.

08

Results that speak volumes

Success no longer depended on how perfect a component was in a vacuum but on how early it could be integrated into the whole. Pathfinder landed on July 4, 1997. It was the first time a rover had moved on the surface of another planet, and it was built for a fraction of the cost of its predecessors, within a third of the time.

Quick questions

Click on the button below to answer a few questions and reflect on SIA.

Underwater Swimmer

01

Respond as a NASA leader

02

Then reflect on your own team

bottom of page